Legal Opinion

Thomas v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 5, 1953No. 50332PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoNes, Chief Judge

This is a claim for salary arising from an alleged reduction in plaintiff’s rank or compensation in violation of section 14 of the Veterans’ Preference Act of June 27, 1944 (5 U. S. C. 863). The part of the statute here relevant provides:

No * * * preference eligible * * * shall be reduced in rank or compensation * * * except for such cause-as will promote the efficiency of the service and for. reasons given in writing, and the person whose * * * reduction in rank or compensation is sought shall have at least thirty days’ advance written notice * * *.

Plaintiff is a.veteran’s preference…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  2. Gray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  3. Love v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  4. O'Hare v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. The Japanese War Notes Association of the Philippines, Inc. (Japwancap, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Braude v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  4. Coastal Petroleum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. Norman J. Mulholland v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API