Legal Opinion

Blumhardt v. Hartung

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1979No. 12488PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSHEIM, Justice.

The plaintiff, Reinhold Blumhardt, seeks damages for injuries he sustained while working at the construction site of a grain elevator in Tulare, South Dakota. His wife, Alice Blumhardt, alleges loss of consortium resulting from these injuries. Worker’s compensation benefits have been received. This action was for recovery against persons other than the employer under the South Dakota Worker’s Compensation Law.1 Defendants P. A. Hartung, Roy Kelsey and I. F. Hartung were officers of defendant Hartung Construction Company and defendant Leonard Mayer was the company foreman on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Funk v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. International Harvester Co. v. SartainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  4. McDonald v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Waggoner v. Midwestern Development, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Badami v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Laber v. KochSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Erickson v. LavielleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Athas v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Gasper v. FreidelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API