In re Metropolitan Jewelry Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of the bankruptcy of the Metropolitan Jewelry Company. Claim of one Meyrowitz for priority under Bankr. Act, § 64b (4), disallowed.
1Opinion of the Court
On Claim for Priority.
MAYER, District Judge.
The testimony in this case discloses that Meyrowitz was so situated in regard to the bankrupt corporation that he was really in charge of the New York office during the absence of the claimant Magid, and bought and sold the goods of the corporation and had full charge of its affairs in Magid’s absence. It is perfectly apparent that Meyrowitz was really the representative of his wife, who, according to her testimony, had advanced $1,500 to the company. Claimant’s wife testified that she had been a stockholder in the bankrupt corporation since August,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Progressive Luggage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- In re Metropolitan Jewelry Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1914