Legal Opinion

In re Metropolitan Jewelry Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 15, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of the bankruptcy of the Metropolitan Jewelry Company. Claim of one Magid for priority under Bankr Act, § 64b (4). Disallowed.

1Opinion of the Court

MAYFR, District Judge.

The claimant, Magid, was the treasurer and general manager of the bankrupt corporation. The corporation *386was composed of his father, who was president and owned $500 in stock, the claimant’s wife, who held $1,500 in stock, and one Smid-rod, who held $100 in stock, which shortly after the incorporation was sold to claimant, so that during practically the entire life of the corporation claimant was general manager, treasurer, and stockholder of the corporation, and represented his wife, who owned the majority of the capital stock of the corporation, in the management of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Metropolitan Jewelry Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Policy Holders Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Carpenter v. Policy Holders Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API