Legal Opinion

In Re Progressive Luggage Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 17, 1929No. 355PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChase, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). It is perfectly plain that the three man who owned all of the stock in this corporation conducted the business as though it were a partnership. The claimant and the others performed work which, to borrow the words of the statute, is often done by “workmen, clerks, traveling or city salesmen, or servants.” The kind of work done, however, is not the sole or real test of priority, hut rather is simply one of the things which help to determine whether the claimant bore to the bankrupt the relation of workman, clerk, traveling or city salesman, or servant, when…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Crown Point Brush Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1912
  2. In re Boston French Range Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916
  3. In re Metropolitan Jewelry Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1914

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Ko-Ed TavernCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. In Re Comtec Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Irving Trust Co. v. RothDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  4. In Re Grant Industries IncorporatedUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1991
  5. In Re Industrial Car Manufacturing Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API