Unklesbay v. Fenwick
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Brogan, Judge.
{¶ 1} The Preferred Mutual Insurance Company appeals from the trial court’s September 15, 2005 order and judgment entry sustaining the motion by appellee, Charles Unklesbay, to compel the production of claims-file materials.
{¶ 2} Preferred Mutual advances four assignments of error on appeal. First, it contends that the trial court abused its discretion in sustaining the motion to compel absent evidence that Unklesbay had complied with Civ.R. 37(E). Second, it asserts that the trial court erred in ordering it to produce privileged materials in its claims file. Third, it claims…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Hoskins v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Zoppo v. Homestead InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Boone v. Vanliner InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Peyko v. FrederickOhio Supreme Court · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Andrews v. Ridco & Twin City Fire Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Horak v. Nationwide Ins. Co., Ca 23327 (7-25-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Perrin v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Nunez Vega v. TivurcioOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Wrinch v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.