Legal Opinion
Petroleum Marketing Group, Inc. v. Janki Patel, Vishal Patel, Jay Shree Khodiyar LLC
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 14, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00587Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PETROLEUM MARKETING : GROUP, INC., : Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:26-CV-587 : v. (JUDGE MANNION) : JANKI PATEL, VISHAL PATEL, JAY SHREE KHODIYAR LLC, : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM Presently, the matter before the Court is Janki Patel’s, Vishal Patel’s, and Jay Shree Khodiyar LLC’s (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss Petroleum Marketing Group’s (“Plaintiff”) unjust enrichment claim. (Doc. 12). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion will be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND The underlying cause of action is before the Court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.