Legal Opinion

Swan v. Mathre

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 16, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Hamilton District Court. — Hon. B. P. Birdsall, Judge. Action at law to recover the amount of a promissory note. After the evidence had been submitted, the district court sustained a motion of the plaintiff for judgment upon the note, and rendered judgment in his favor for costs. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

*2631 *262The note in suit was made by the defendant on the twenty-fifth day of June, 1891, for the sum of one hundred and twenty-five dollars, payable on or bef ore two years after its date'to Tjernagel Bros., with interest at the rate of six per cent, per annum after one jsear. It was given for capital stock of an incorporation known as the Scandia Publishing and Printing Company, and was transferred to the plaintiff by an indorsement in blank. The defendant alleges that the note was procured by means of false and fraudulent representations, without consideration, and that the plaintiff knew of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKown v. FurgasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  2. Parks v. BurbankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Zion's Co-op. Home Building & Real Estate Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Federal Agency Investment Co. v. HolmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Industrial Transp. Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Garrett v. SlavensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Industrial Transp. Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API