Legal Opinion

Federal Agency Investment Co. v. Holm

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 12, 1927No. 27,181PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was one to recover on a promissory note given in payment of a policy of insurance in the Federal Reserve Life Insurance Company. The defense was that the note was procured through false and fraudulent representations. Judgment was for plaintiff on defendant’s opening statement and defendant appeals.

The plaintiff alleged substantially that it was engaged in the business of soliciting life insurance on the lives of individuals as the general agent for the Federal Reserve Life Insurance Company; that about December 7, 1923, it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Robertson v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  2. Warner v. BenjaminWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Columbia Electric Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Else v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  5. Lake v. Security Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Dreiling v. Home State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Hawthorn-Mellody, Inc. v. DriessenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. First National Bank v. MenseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Stock v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API