Legal Opinion

State of Texas v. Heilman, Ex Parte Eric Michael

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 2015No. PD-1591-13Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1591-13 EX PARTE ERIC MICHAEL HEILMAN, Appellee ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS JEFFERSON COUNTY A LCALA, J., filed a dissenting opinion. DISSENTING OPINION Because it unnecessarily overrules this Court’s recent precedent in Phillips v. State, I respectfully dissent from this Court’s judgment reversing the court of appeals’ affirmance of the order granting post-conviction habeas corpus relief to Eric Michael Heilman. See Phillips v. State,

362 S.W.3d 606, 608-10

(Tex. Crim. App. 2011); State v. Heilman,

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Hammock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Proctor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API