Rudd v. Ray
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Justice.
This is a taxpayer’s derivative suit challenging the constitutionality of legislation which provides for salaried chaplains and religious facilities at the state penitentiary. The challenge is grounded on both federal and state constitutions. The trial court held the legislation does not offend the federal constitution but does offend the state constitution. Accordingly the trial court enjoined the use of public funds for such purposes. We believe the legislation violates neither constitution. We reverse the trial court and remand for dissolution of the injunction.
The facts…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Amended August 21, 2014 Ned Chiodo v. The Section 43.24 Panel Consisting of: Secretary of State Matthew Schultz, Auditor of State Mary Mosiman and Attorney General Thomas MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Chittenden Town School District v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- State v. OlsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Redmond v. RaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Zimmer v. Vander WaalSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.