Legal Opinion

Ramsey County ex rel. Pierce County, Wisconsin v. Carey

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 2002No. C7-01-2052Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.*

On appeal from the denial of his motion to reduce his support obligation, appellant-father, who is totally disabled and lives with his parents, alleges (a) payments by his parents for his expenses should not be imputed to him as income; (b) his current net monthly income is below the poverty line, making child-care cost reimbursement presumptively unreasonable; and (c) equity requires that his support obligation be adjusted to be commensurate with his disability benefits. Because we agree that the magistrate erred in including as income to appellant the value of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marriage of Holmberg v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. Putz v. PutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Barnier v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Franzen v. BordersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API