Legal Opinion

McMillin v. Farmers & Bankers Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1949No. 37,600PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

This is an action against the defendant insurance company for the amount claimed to be due plaintiff as beneficiary under a life insurance policy on the life of her husband with a double indemnity benefit rider attached. Payment was made on the face amount of the policy but it is alleged she did not know at the time of the payment and the giving of the receipt and release that the death of her husband had resulted from an accident, but being so informed later, brings this action to recover under the double indemnity provision.

The policy in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hodgson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Tucker v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. Werth v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estates of Thompson v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  2. Fieser v. StinnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Reynard v. BradshawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Snider v. MarpleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. BussDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API