Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Buss
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
ARTHUR J. STANLEY, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved for a new trial, the court having announced that judgment would be for the defendants.
In its complaint, plaintiff seeks to establish the validity of a “husband and wife release” admittedly executed by the defendants on August 9, 1957. Defendants assert the invalidity of the release on the grounds of inadequacy of consideration, fraud in its procurement and mutual mistake of fact.
The court, after hearing the evidence, found that the execution of the release by the defendants was not procured by fraud or misrepresentation on the part of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Nilsson v. KruegerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
- Koshka v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Smith v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Casey v. ProctorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Fieser v. StinnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Whidden v. Francis, Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County1966
- Robles v. Trinidad Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Ferguson v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.