Legal Opinion
Jolliff v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 22, 2008No. 06-2434PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOGGS, Chief Judge.
John Jolliff and Steven Daniels petition for review of the Order of the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) denying their claims arising under § 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (“Act”), codified at 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1). Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) William G. Kocol originally found in the employees’ favor, holding that the employees had been terminated for engaging in an activity — writing a letter complaining about working conditions — that was protected under the Act. On review, the Board held that the employees’ activities were stripped of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Thomas M. Cooley Law School v. Kurzon Strauss, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- National Labor Relations Board v. Galicks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- DirecTV, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Loftus v. NazariDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.