Legal Opinion
City of Akron v. Tipton
Akron Municipal Court
Decided October 31, 1989No. Nos. 89 CRB 6541, 89 CRB 6548, 89 CRB 6549, 89 CRB 6551 and 89 CRB 6552PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTed Schneiderman, J.
On September 26, 1989, the defendant, Lawrence E. Tipton, through his attorney, filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the ordinance under which the defendant is charged is unconstitutional on its face. The defendant requested an evidentiary hearing, and evidence was received on October 5, 1989 and concluded on October 10, 1989.
The motion to dismiss claims that the ordinance is unconstitutional for the following reasons:(1) it violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution with respect to due process, both procedurally and substantively;(2) it violates the Equal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kelley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State ex rel. Jackman v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- City of South Euclid v. JemisonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Hoover v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim BlattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
- City of Cleveland v. JohnsonCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2005
- State v. GravesOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim BlattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015