Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. Charles J. Murphy & Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided July 23, 1998No. 98CA0086PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROY.
Anita Ortiz (claimant) seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) denying her petition to reopen her workers’ compensation claim against her employer, Charles J. Murphy & Co., and its insurer, Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority, (collectively CCIA) and denying her claim for medical benefits. We affirm.
The sole issue on review is what constitutes the “date of injury” for purposes of determining the running of the time permitted for reopening an occupational disease claim which, according to § 8-43-303(1), C.R.S.1997, must be reopened…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Henderson v. RSI, INC.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Martinez v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
- Ricks v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Robbins Flower Shop v. CineaColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Sci Manufacturing v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leming v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Calvert v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- City of Colorado Springs v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Union Carbide Corp. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Industrial Claims OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.