State ex rel. Kuhn v. Luchsinger
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
As it appears that the petitioner Arnold F. Kuhn seeks, in good faith, leave to commence an original action of mandamus to require the granting of an order for a change of venue, which he charges was wrongfully denied, *535he is entitled to have this court grant his application for such leave. State ex rel. Federal M. A. Ins. Co. v. Kellogg, 189 Wis. 638, 208 N. W. 246; State ex rel. Jefson v. Mahoney, 204 Wis. 440, 235 N. W. 926. Under the stipulation between the parties that the petition shall stand as the relator’s complaint and that the defendant, Judge Luchsinger, shall be deemed to- have…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mittenthal v. MascagniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Daley v. People's Building, Loan & Saving Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Carpenter v. ShepardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- State ex rel. Bobroff v. BraunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Coleman v. PercyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Cutter v. Scott & Fetzer Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1981
- Banco de Ponce v. IriarteSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1942
- Rose v. EtlingOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Zurich Ins. Co. v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.