Legal Opinion

Rose v. Etling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1970PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding to require a change of venue from the District Court of Multnomah County to the District Court of Lane County in an action on a retail installment sales contract. In that action, brought by the Bonded Credit Corporation, the defendants, who were the purchasers under that contract, resided and were served in Lane County.

The contract provided that:

“Purchaser hereby consents * * * to the laying of venue in Multnomah County * * * at the option of secured Party. * * * Purchaser * * * waives the right to move for change of venue.”

A motion for change of venue in that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Duncan v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Mutzig v. HopeOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Texas Moline Plow Co. v. BiggerstaffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Chem Industrial CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Kohring v. BallardOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. W. J. Seufert Land Co. v. GreenfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Cerami-Kote, Inc. v. Energywave Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Miller v. Pacific Trawlers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API