Legal Opinion
Admiral Plastics Corp., and Cross-Appellant v. Trueblood, Inc., and Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1971No. 20383, 20384PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arose out of an action for damages filed in the District Court by Admiral Plastics Corporation (Admiral) of New York against Trueblood, Inc. (Trueblood) of Dayton, Ohio, for breach of a contract in which Trueblood agreed to design and manufacture for Admiral three injection blow mold machines, at a cost of $39,750.00 per machine. Jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship. The case was governed by Ohio law.
The District Court, sitting without a jury, found that both parties failed to act in good faith and failed to cooperate in the performance of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dickson v. WolinOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
- Brown v. JohnstonOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Hayes v. HettingaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Mann & Parker Lumber Co. v. Wel-DriCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- The Mann And Parker Lumber Company v. Wel-DriCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- G/GM Real Estate Corp. v. Svisse Chalet Motor Lodge of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990