Legal Opinion

Dickson v. Wolin

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1934No. 2442PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPJNION

By WASHBURN, PJ.

This action is an action to quiet plaintiff’s title against any right of defendants arising by virtue of said agreement, or in the alternative to require defendants to obey the provisions of said contract, should its terms be found to be binding upon the parties thereto or their successors.

It is an elementary rule of contracts that, upon a material breach of a contract by one party thereto, the other contracting party may, at his option, elect to rescind the contract, or continue it in force and sue for damages for the breach.

It is also fundamental that the parties to a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Graves v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. Rhodes Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Hunter v. Bps Guard Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Cantor v. CantorMontgomery County Probate Court · 1959
  4. Coconis v. Christakis, Belmont County Courts, Ohio1981
  5. Admiral Plastics Corp., and Cross-Appellant v. Trueblood, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API