Legal Opinion
Mann & Parker Lumber Co. v. Wel-Dri
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 20, 1978No. Nos. 76-2557, 76-2558PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Circuit Judge.
This was an action for damages brought by plaintiff, The Mann and Parker Lumber Company, in the District Court against defendants, Wel-Dri, Inc. and Moore Dry Kiln Company of Oregon, for breach of a contract in which defendants agreed to sell and install at plaintiff’s plant dry kilns and lumber handling equipment. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. The case is governed by Tennessee law.
The District Court sitting without a jury found that there was a valid and enforceable contract and that the defendants breached it causing damage to the plaintiff in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moore v. Howard Pontiac-American, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
- Admiral Plastics Corp., and Cross-Appellant v. Trueblood, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by4 opinions
- The Mead Corporation v. McNally Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Appalachian Railcar Services, Inc. v. Boatright Enterprises, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
- The Mann And Parker Lumber Company v. Wel-DriCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Savage Industries, Inc. v. American Pulverizer Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996