Legal Opinion

Martinez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 15, 1994No. B14-92-00401-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEARS, Justice.

Appellant was found guilty by a jury of murder. The jury assessed punishment at 10 years probation and a seven hundred and fifty dollar fine, ($750.00), also probated. Appellant brings two points of error, both asking for reformation of the judgment. We affirm the judgment as reformed.

In his first point of error, Appellant maintains that the trial court erred in requiring that Appellant pay a fine as a condition of his probation, when the jury’s verdict clearly stated that the fine was to be probated and not paid. When the jury recommends that a fine be probated and not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Heath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Ex Parte PoeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Hooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Goehring v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brooks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
  2. McCallum v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  3. Dickson v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  4. Derek Maurice Roots v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
  5. Harrell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API