Legal Opinion
City of Holyoke Gas & Electric Department v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Northeast Utilities Service Company, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 31, 1992No. 90-1565PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge D.H. GINSBURG.
D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:
The City of Holyoke Gas & Electric Department entered into a power transmission agreement with Northeast Utilities Service Co. (NU). When NU filed the agreement with the FERC, Holyoke challenged the rate on various grounds, but the Commission approved it. Holyoke now petitions for review, alleging that the Commission acted arbitrarily and capriciously in upholding the rate as reasonable, denying Holyoke’s request for an evidentiary hearing on the question of undue discrimination, and waiving the statutory…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- City of Girard, Kansas v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Kansas Gas and Electric Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Sierra Pacific Power Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and Utah Power and Light Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3Cited by11 opinions
- Checkosky v. SecCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Sithe/independence Power Partners, L.P. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Joseph Padgett v. Brian LoventhalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Checkosky v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.