Legal Opinion
Prime v. Nichols
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 12, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs, owners by mesne assignments of a mortgage given in 1894, which mortgage had been extended from time to time by agreements making a subsequent owner of the mortgaged property (now deceased) primarily hable on the mortgage debt now past due, are unable to foreclose because of the so-called Moratorium Laws. It is alleged that the property has so diminished in value that when foreclosure occurs it is unlikely that it will sell for the amount of the debt. In the meantime the subsequent owner of the premises, William P. Burrows, who became hable for the mortgage debt, has died. His…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rice v. Van VrankenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Rice v. Van VrankenNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Rice v. Van VrankenNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- In re the Estate of HornerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- Bankers Surety Co. v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re PrimeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Final Account of Proceedings of NicholsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- In re the Estate of BurrowsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939