Legal Opinion
In re Prime
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided February 21, 1938PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Millard, S.
The petitioners, owners by assignment of a bond and mortgage in the amount of $2,000 covering real property in the city of Yonkers, seek to compel the respondent, Isabel Nichols, as executrix, to account and to pay the amount of such bond, with interest, on the theory that it is a debt within the meaning and application of sections 212, 217 and 259 of the Surrogate’s Court Act.
Under the will of William F. Burrows, his brother, Leo P. Burrows, was the executor and sole legatee and devisee. Prior to the final settlement of his estate, however, Leo P. Burrows died, and the respondent,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weisel v. Hagdahl Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Johnson v. CorbettNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
- Hauselt v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- In re the Estate of HornerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of PerkinsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Doyle v. GravesNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- In re the Accounting of SchwartzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
- In Re Finnerud's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- In re the Estate of BurrowsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- In re the Estate of ReillyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.