Legal Opinion
Hurst v. Nagle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 14, 1929No. 5436PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
In September, 1023, the appellant, a British seaman in the British navy, deserted his ship at the port of San Francisco and entered the United States, where, following industrial pursuits., he remained until an undetermined date in May, 1924, when he made a trip into Mexico, returning on the same day, without having presented himself for examination. Thereafter he remained continuously in the United States. On September 21, 1927, the Secretary of Labor issued a warrant for his arrest on the ground that in May, 1924, he entered the United States without being admitted…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commissioner of Immigration of Port of NY v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ex parte MarchantDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1925
- Nagle v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- United States ex rel. Gottlieb v. Commissioner of Immigration of Port of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Guimond v. HowesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Aston Bartholomew v. Universe Tankships, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Barber v. VarletaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. ParisiDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1938
- United States ex rel. Georgas v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Kaichiro Sugimoto v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.