Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Gottlieb v. Commissioner of Immigration of Port of New York

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 17, 1922No. 72PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The question presented by this appeal involves a novel and important question under the Immigration Exclusion Act. If the immigration authorities are right in their understanding of the act, under which the relators have been denied a right to enter the country, a wife and child of a minister, resident in the United States, must be separated from him and returned to the country from whence they came, and the conditions said to prevail in that country as to persons of their particular faith seem to be such as to make their deportation one of unusual…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Lau Ow Bew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Bloomer v. McQuewanSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  5. Bate Refrigerating Co. v. SulzbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Immigration of Port of NY v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Hurst v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  3. Grier v. KennanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  4. United States ex rel. Randazzo v. TodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  5. United States ex rel. Markarian v. TodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API