Legal Opinion
Guimond v. Howes
District Court, D. Maine
Decided December 30, 1925No. 16, 17PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALE, District Judge.
Tbe petitions for. habeas corpus allege that, by a decree of the Department of Labor, the petitioners have been ordered to be deported from the United States to Canada. The Department of Labor claims that the evidence in the hearing held before Carr G. Horne, Immigrant Inspector, at Rumford, Me., discloses the petitioners to have entered the United States unlawfully and without inspection, and that each- is likely to become a public charge; that the petitioners are at Rumford, Me., under the restraint of Samuel H. Howes, district director of immigration at the port of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lau Ow Bew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lewis v. FrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Lapina v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States ex rel. Bauder v. UhlCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Ex parte HornDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rosenberg v. FleutiSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hurst v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- United States ex rel. Kowalenski v. FlynnDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1927
- Ex parte PiazzolaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1926
- United States ex rel. Fanutti v. FlynnDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.