United States v. Bledsoe
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
KASTL, Senior Judge:
In the face of telling professional opinion questioning the accused’s mental state, we return this case for further inquiry into his mental capacity and responsibility
Facts
The accused was convicted of larceny and damage to property of the United States, in violation of Articles 121 and 108, U.C.M.J., 10 U.S.C. §§ 908, 921. His sentence extends to a dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for 30 months, and accessory penalties.
The facts bearing on this issue are set forth in the able appellate defense brief:
During an Article 39(a), 10 U.S.C. § 839(a)…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. BabbidgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. TriplettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. CareyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. BledsoeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. DockU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. BledsoeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. MartinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. MasseyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.