Barrett v. Shambeau
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Defendants had a directed verdict, and plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
The action arises out of the promotion of the Senac Automatic Oil Burner Corporation, incorporated under the laws of Delaware, May 8, 1926, and at once admitted to do business in Minnesota. The initiators of the scheme were defendants, Bandall probably taking the lead. They induced plaintiff to join and to subscribe and pay in $3,000, for which stock was issued to and received by him. The plan rvas that the corporation should take over from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Davis v. Las Ovas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Battelle v. Northwestern Cement & Concrete Pavement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Graffam v. LynottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- American Barley Co. v. McCourtieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921