Legal Opinion

Kennett v. Engle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Van Burén. (Buck, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment for injuries arising from the bite of a dog. The evidence tended to show that tbe defendant was the keeper of tbe dog; that he was a physician and" druggist at Hartford; that the plaintiff went upon defendant’s premises to consult him as a physician.; that he was bitten by the dog; and that, as a result of the injury, he was prevented from following his business as a laborer for a considerable length of time. The judgment recovered was for $200. Defendant brings error.

We shall pass over many of tbe assignments of error, for the reason that, in our judgment,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Buckley v. LeonardNew York Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Trager v. ThorMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Co. v. Ellington's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908
  4. O'Neill v. BlaseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Nicholes v. LorenzMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API