Legal Opinion

Pizzullo v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 7, 2008No. A-21 September Term 2007PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoens

In this matter, we are called upon to determine the scope that our Legislature intended to be afforded to the statute enacted in June 1993, which granted automobile insurers immunity from suit arising from an insured’s election of coverage. See N.J.S.A 17:28-1.9(a). The trial court, after first concluding that the statute did not provide the insurer with immunity, determined that the insurer was equitably estopped to decline coverage. The Appellate Division reversed, finding that the statute afforded the insurer immunity and rejecting the application of the estoppel doctrine as having been…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Zacarias v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. Allen v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Gerhardt v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  5. Harr v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  2. Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Melcar Utility Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. McGovern v. RutgersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  4. Allen v. v. AND a BROS., INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  5. Marino v. MarinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API