Bartholomew v. Burger King Corp.
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT BURGER KING CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DOC. NO. 189
J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a tort action arising from an incident in which Plaintiff Clark Bartholomew (“Bartholomew”) allegedly sustained injuries from eating a Triple Whopper sandwich imbedded with two needle-shaped metal objects at a Burger King Restaurant franchised to Defendant Army and Air Force Exchange Service (“AAFES”).
On October 12, 2011, Bartholomew, his wife, and his son (“Plaintiffs”) filed this action alleging tortious conduct by Defendants Burger King…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- C.W. v. Nevada Department of EducationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- Jodell Dodge v. FirstService Residential Arizona LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- R.T. v. RRI West Management LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025