Bell v. R. D. Wood & Co. ex rel. Camden Iron Works
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 496, Jan. T., 1896, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. Blair Co., No. 257, Docket “ A ” in equity. Bill in equity for an injunction, and for the appointment of a receiver.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 496, Jan. T., 1896, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. Blair Co., No. 257, Docket “ A ” in equity. Bill in equity for an injunction, and for the appointment of a receiver. The facts appear by the opinion- of Barker, P. J., of the 47th judicial district, specially presiding, which was as follows: The plaintiffs in this suit own a majority of the shares of stock of the Bellwood Water Company, amounting to some $21,000, and on the 23d of May, 1896, they filed a bill of complaint in their own behalf and on behalf of any such other stockholders as might see fit to join in the same. In…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
A careful consideration of this record discloses no error in the decree of July 21,1896, or in the proceedings leading up thereto. The action of the court below in dissolving the preliminary injunction and dismissing the bill at the plaintiff’s costs is so fully vindicated in the clear and convincing opinion of the learned president of the 47th judicial district, who specially presided at the hearing, that nothing need be added thereto.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at plaintiffs’ costs.
2Cited by8 opinions
- McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Brothers v. Girard National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Hogsett v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Cronan v. District CourtIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Margo v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.