Margo v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 145, Oct. T., 1905, by defendant, from orders of C. P. Cambria Co., March T., 1905, No. 82, discharging rules to set aside sale of personal property in case of Annie Margo v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Rules to set aside sale of personal property. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned were orders discharging rules to set aside sale of personal property.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Elkin,
The plaintiff recovered a verdict in the court below in an action of trespass for injuries resulting in the death of her husband. On February 10,1905, after a new trial had been refused, judgment was entered on the verdict. On March 4, a fieri facias was issued thereon returnable the first Monday of June following. A levy was then made on some personal property in the office of the superintendent of the defendant company. On March 13, the defendant took an appeal to the Supreme Court. On the following day the levy was stricken off by order of the court. On May 22,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foster & Co. v. Fowler & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- East Side Bank v. Columbus Tanning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Youngman v. Elmira & Williamsport RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Bell v. R. D. Wood & Co. ex rel. Camden Iron WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Mausel v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vulcanite Paving Co. v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Bachrach v. Huntingdon & Broad Top Mountain R. R. & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Martin v. City of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- McNulty Bros. v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Best v. Blue Ridge Water Supply Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1926