Legal Opinion

Thys v. Rivard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1947No. 30340PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

This is the second appeal by plaintiffs in this action. Upon the first appeal, Thys v. Rivard, 25 Wn. (2d) 345, 171 P. (2d) 255, this court reversed a judgment entered by the trial court and remanded the case for further proceedings in the superior court, and in so doing, used the following expression:

“We hold that the matter of respondent’s liability to appellants depends upon whether or not respondent constructed and used a machine or appliance which is covered by appellants’ patents. If respondent did this, while he is not responsible as for infringement of patent, he is liable to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  5. Burr v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1864

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bonanza Real Estate, Inc. v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. Thys v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API