Legal Opinion

Fairley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1989No. 55513PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant seeks to vacate his conviction for second degree murder and sentence of life imprisonment. Movant was convicted pursuant to an Alford plea of guilty following plea negotiations.

We first note that movant’s statement of facts in his brief is not in accord with Rule 84.04(c). Movant sets forth the procedural events that occurred, but he states no facts relevant to the questions he presents for determination by this court.

For movant to be entitled to an evidentia-ry hearing, he must…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Gawne v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Reeder v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Recklein v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Belcher v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Nimrod v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Poole v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API