Legal Opinion

Fischkoff v. Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided October 17, 2018No. 17 Civ. 5041 (GWG)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge

Steven Fischkoff brought this suit against Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. and *385Maria Fardis (collectively "Iovance") alleging that Iovance beached a contractual employment agreement, failed to pay him wages, and retaliated against him. Fischkoff now moves to amend his complaint to include a claim of defamation.1 For the reasons stated below, Fischkoff's motion is granted.

I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

Because the resolution of Fischkoff's motion turns on whether his proposed defamation claim states a claim for relief, we accept "all factual…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. Acito v. IMCERA Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nahl v. JaoudeDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Abadi v. NYU Langone Health SystemDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  3. Cicel (Beijing) Science & Technology Co., Ltd. v. Misonix, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020
  4. Loughlin v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  5. Loughlin v. HaradaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API