Legal Opinion

Loughlin v. Harada

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 28, 2021No. 1:20-cv-01055Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE SUZANNE LOUGHLIN, HARRY RHULEN, : and JAMES SATTERFIELD, : Plaintiffs, v. : C.A. No. 20-1055-LPS CHRISTINE HARADA, DAVID HANLON, STEVEN D. CROXTON, EYAL HEN, : and ROBERT A. BERMAN, Defendants. : Brian M. Gottesman, David B. Anthony, and Peter C. McGivney, BERGER HARRIS LLP, Wilmington, DE Attomeys for Plaintiffs Paul D. Brown, CHIPMAN BROWN CICERO & COLE, LLP, Wilmington, DE Keith M. Fleischman, Joshua D. Glatter, and June Park, FLEISCHMAN BONNER & ROCCO LLP, White Plains, NY Attorneys for Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Robert Spruill v. Frank Gillis Goolier, C.O. McGlaughlin M.D. Brown, P.ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API