Legal Opinion

Nucorp, Inc. v. Montgomery County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1980No. 80-370PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented is whether failure to comply with the 45-day requirement contained on DTE Form 1 for the filing of supplemental information is a jurisdictional defect.

While this court has never spoken directly to this issue, it has held that BTA Form 1, the predecessor to DTE Form 1, “ * * * represents a lawful interpretation of the minimal, data requirements of R. C. 5715.19 and 5715.13,” Stanjim Co. v. Bd. of Revision (1974), 38 Ohio St. 2d 233, 236. Such form had to be fully completed by any taxpayer who desired to have the assessed value of property reduced, and failure to do so was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stanjim Co. v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Griffith v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Groveport Madison Local Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. In Re Z.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Mason City School District Board of Education v. Warren County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Shinkle v. Ashtabula County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Smith v. May (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API