Legal Opinion
Van Beek v. Robinson
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 16, 2012No. Case No. 11-10514PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*709 OPINION AND ORDER
LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment [dkt. 36]. The parties have fully briefed the motion. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties’ papers such that the decision process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Therefore, pursuant to E.D. Mich. L.R. 7.1(f)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion be resolved on the briefs submitted. For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED.
II. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Loretta Van Beek…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Darwish v. PompeoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022