Legal Opinion · Dissent

John Robert Harrell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 3, 1967No. 15739Published

1DissentCummings, Circuit Judge

In my opinion, the District Court’s denial of petitioner’s April 1966 motion under Section 2255 of the Judicial Code (28 USC § 2255) was improper. Under that Section, a hearing is required “unless the motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief” (italics supplied).

Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487, 496, 82 S.Ct. 510, the leading case, admonishes that a hearing is required even though a petitioner’s assertions are “improbable”, if they are not clearly “incredible”. Here the petitioner’s April 1966 motion, supported by his,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API