Legal Opinion

Bishop v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 18, 2000No. 129, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

This State’s Insurance Code, Maryland Code (1957, 1991 Repl.Vol., 1992 Cum.Supp.), Article 48 A, § 539, and its motor vehicle law, Code (1977, 1987 Repl.Vol.), §§ 17-103 and 17-104(b) of the Transportation Article, generally require that motor vehicle insurance policies on vehicles required to be registered in Maryland provide coverage for “medical, hospital, and disability benefits” in a minimum amount of $2500. 1 These benefits are known as “Personal Injury Protection” or “PIP” benefits, and they are payable without regard to fault. The issue in this case is whether the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Boyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GartelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Allstate Insurance v. HartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Reese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Forbes v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lovelace v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Dutta v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. PaineWebber Inc. v. EastCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Thacker v. City of HyattsvilleCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Hamilton v. Kirson Alston v. 2700 VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API