Legal Opinion
Designers North Carpet, Inc. v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 17, 2001No. CV01-0053(ADS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
This case arises out of claims by Designers North Carpet, Inc. (“Designers” or the “plaintiff’) that Mohawk Industries, Inc. (“Mohawk” or the “defendant”) acted in bad faith and breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and, therefore, violated alleged agreements between the companies. The plaintiff also claims that the defendant violated section 349 of the New York General Business Law (“NYGBL”). Presently before the Court is a motion by Mohawk to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Leonard F. v. Israel Discount Bank of New York, and the Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- William Hayden v. County of Nassau, United States of America and Nassau County Guardians Association, Defendants-Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey LittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jurista v. Amerinox Processing, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Gallo v. PHH Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- RoTec Services, Inc. v. Encompass Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Highland CDO Opportunity Master Fund, L.P. v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Montblanc-Simplo GmbH v. Aurora Due S.R.L.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.