Legal Opinion

George v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 4, 2004No. CR 01-871PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

After a Greene County Deputy jound what appeared to be a meth lab in a shed on the property of appellant, Myron George, both appellant and Martin Strugala were arrested. Following appellant’s arrest, a search, executed pursuant to a warrant, revealed a working meth lab, components used to produce methamphetamine, and finished methamphetamine. In a criminal information, appellant was charged with being an accomplice in the manufacturing of methamphetamine, possession of methamphetamine, and theft by receiving.

Prior to trial, appellant filed a pro se motion seeking to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Rankin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Atkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Pyle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Walley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Jester v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Malone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. McKenzie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API