Legal Opinion

Warders v. Union Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 7, 1919No. 21,624PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Marshall district court; Fred R. Smith, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for the death of their infant child, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant at a crossing of the defendant’s railroad and a public highway. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs for $2,400, and the defendant appeals.

The propositions argued are: ■ first, that the evidence to show the plaintiff’s financial loss was insufficient; second, that the trial court erred in assuming that the child would have lived until it attained the age of eighteen years;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gailey v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Hamilton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  5. Murphy v. Ludowici Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Skaer v. American National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Butler v. TownendIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Turman v. Solvay Process Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Bowman v. CoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API