Bowman v. Coyle
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
The plaintiff sued to recover $69,250, damages sustained by reason of the negligence of the defendant, a practicing physician, in administering an enema of a twenty-five per cent solution of caustic soda (concentrated lye) instead of an enema of Epsom salts. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the sum of $25,000, from which the defendant appeals.
Special questions, were answered by the jury as follows:
“1. Do you find that the area of the burn caused by the caustic, soda extended beyond the third valve of Houston? A. Don’t know.
“2. If you…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. PeaveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. ConeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. FraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Warders v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.