Hendrix v. Novartis Pharmaceutical Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [106]
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation’s (“NPC”) Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”). (Docket No. 106). This case was assigned to this Court on March 19, 2013.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Undisputed Facts
Plaintiff Michel Hendrix was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in September 1999 by his oncologist, Dr. Berenson. (Plaintiffs Counter-Statement of Uncontroverted Facts (“PCUF”) ¶ 1). As part of his treatment for bone-related…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bigsby v. Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Bekins v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LPDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Farshad Agahi v. Ramin KhorramiDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
- Kim Kempf, et al. v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Yetter v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019