Legal Opinion

State v. Hogevoll

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 5, 2008No. 055715; A134536PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*528EDMONDS, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for exceeding the bag limit on coast bull elk, ORS 498.002,1 a Class A misdemeanor, ORS 496.992(1).2 The conviction arises from a 2005 second season coast bull elk hunt where defendant shot and killed one elk, found a second elk that was shot and killed by someone else, and took possession of both elk. The issue on appeal is whether, as a matter of law, a person who has killed and tagged a second season coast bull elk commits the crime of exceeding the bag limit on coast bull elk by taking possession of an additional second season…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. WoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Stanley v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HOGEVOLLOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. MankillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. State v. MankillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. HogevollCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API